Answer:
For years, a mathematics professor experienced abusive behavior at a community college where he taught. It began with a few deans spreading rumors and false accusations that threatened his job. The abuse was emotionally draining and took time and focus away from his job. The professor was the victim of <u>bullying (mobbing).</u>
Explanation:
Bullying that takes place in the workplace is called mobbing, it is defined as negative behavior among colleagues or between hierarchical superiors or inferiors, because of which the person affected is harassed and attacked for a long time, directly or indirectly, on the part of one or more people, with the aim and / or effect of emptying it out. The behaviors that constitute bullying can be very diverse, but in most cases these are behaviors that discriminate, weaken, humiliate, ridicule, offend or threaten the integrity of the worker. Most of these behaviors are carried out in a subtle way, gradually undermining the worker's moral integrity, producing psychological-emotional exhaustion that can affect not only in the workplace but also outside of it.
The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
Mexico faces the challenges today are poverty and drug-related violence.
Answer: Option B and C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
As indicated by Mexico's national measurements organization, the second quarter of 2018 saw the pace of development in Mexico's economy contract.
Because of the combined impact of declining generation in the oil, rural and mechanical parts alongside the possibility of an extreme liberal system change set to take control in December.
The quarter was anticipated for a 0.1% constriction in GDP, yet the reexamined numbers currently show the pace of decrease really multiplied, down an occasionally balanced 0.2%, contrasted with last past quarter.
Mexico is famous for its drug cartels. These cartels and drugs are traded extensively across the borders between Mexico and the United States of America.
This has resulted in a drug war not only with countries like the Colombia and the United States of America but also within Mexico too. Although this does not happen in the open, it is something which has drawn the attention of the entire world.