Answer:
nature , nurture
Explanation:
The long held debate of nature vs nurture, arises from ancient philosopers and continues in the present. In the yaer of 1869 the issue was named "Nature versus Nurture" by Englishmen Francis Galton.
It was a time where the genotypes and clues of the existence of the DNA were emerging, and people where to observe if genetics shaped personality- or if in the contrary the cultural, social, and educational experiencies will be more important in personality formation.
There exists today a widespread consensus that, to certain degree, there will be always some natural components like the eye color and color of skin, that will however after birth be shaped by environmental factors and the lifestyle.
In the case of other internal characteristics, internal and external forces will shape as well.
1777: The colonial victory over British troops at the Battle of Saratoga persuades France to provide financial and military support that will prove vital to the success of the American Revolution.1862: The Homestead Act makes more than 600 million acres of land available to be settled, sparking the largest migration of Americans in the nation's history.1933: President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal launches a series of unprecedented laws and programs that will relieve the stress of the Great Depression and reshape American society.<span>2001: The 9/11 terrorist attacks spark a complex and controversial war against terrorism both domestically and internationally.</span>
Answer:
Their results include major changes in culture, economy and socio-political institutions, usually in response to perceived overwhelming autocracy or plutocracy. Scholarly debates about what does and does not constitute a revolution center on several issues.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
