The court should suppress all of the evidence because it was the fruit of an unconstitutional arrest. As a general rule, the police must have an arrest warrant to effect an arrest of an individual in his own home.
Explanation:
Primary Source. The evidence that gives this away is that it is a fragment of a stone dated back to 232 B.C.
The author of this artifact was Asoka. The Mauryan Leader.
The purpose of creating this artifact was to assert Asoka's Buddhism and support his desire to spread dharma.
Evidence that makes me think this is that the tenets have Buddhism engraved them meaning that they had some sort of meaning to the leader.
Something that we have today that is similar to Asoka's rock pillars are edicts?
I hope this helps you out. I wasn't too sure about the last question though.
Answer:
It wont move because there is no dominant force: it is neutral.
Explanation:
Let's say I have a 10 and another 10 one side pushing against each other. They aren't going to move but let's say one of the ten's becomes an 11 then the 11 will start winning and pushing against the 10.
1: Peninsula
2: Volcanoes
3: 4
4: Destructive Waves
Hope this helps!
