1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zaharov [31]
3 years ago
12

Although Martin is not in top management, he is charismatic and well liked by others in his organization. Other employees often

look to Martin to see how he reacts to new policies implemented by top management, and they follow his lead. Martin has ____ leadership in his organization.
Business
1 answer:
Bingel [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<em>Informal leadership</em>

Explanation:

Informal leadership is an individual's <em>ability to manipulate other people's behavior through means other  than structured authority granted by the company across its rules and regulations. </em>

Informal leadership is simply any kind of leadership that is not formally based.

You might be interested in
John has an auto which is covered for collision losses subject to a $250 deductible. Kate's auto also has collision coverage but
DerKrebs [107]

Answer: D. Kate's policy will pay $1,500, and John's policy will pay $250.

Explanation:

The deductible is the amount that a policy holder has to pay before the insurance company pays the remaining amount.

From the question, we are informed that John has an auto which is covered for collision losses subject to a $250 deductible while Kate's auto also has collision coverage but her deductible is $500.

If a $2,000 collision loss occurs when John borrows Kate's car because his car is in the shop for repairs, since John has a deductible of $500, Kates policy will pay ($2000 - $500) = $1500 and John's policy will pay $250.

3 0
3 years ago
Netpass company has 600,000 shares of common stock authorized, 510,000 shares issued, and 240,000 shares of treasury stock. the
irinina [24]
<span>The company has issued only 510,000 shares out of authorized 600,000 common stocks. As we know that dividend is paid only on issued shared, and treasury stocks do not get any dividend. So the total amount of dividend that will be paid = 0.65 * 510,000 = $331,500</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The following expenditures relating to plant assets were made by Prather Company during the first 2 months of 2020. Opposite eac
hammer [34]

Answer: Please refer to Explanation

Explanation:

1.Paid $5,000 of accrued taxes at time plant site was acquired.

LAND ACCOUNT because it is to be capitalized as it was part of the Acquisition Cost.

2.Paid $200 insurance to cover possible accident loss on new factory machinery while the machinery was in transit.

EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT as it is part of Acquisition Cost.

3.Paid $850 sales taxes on new delivery truck.

EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT as it is again part of Acquisition Cost.

4.Paid $17,500 for parking lots and driveways on new plant site.

LAND IMPROVEMENT ACCOUNT

5.Paid $250 to have company name and advertising slogan painted on new delivery truck.

EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT as it is a cost of setting the PPE up.

6.Paid $8,000 for installation of new factory machinery.

EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT as this expense is again part of setting the equipment up.

7.Paid $900 for one-year accident insurance policy on new delivery truck.

PREPAID INSURANCE because this is a periodic cost and those are not capitalized as they provide only a short term benefit.

8.Paid $75 motor vehicle license fee on the new truck.

LICENSE EXPENSE because it is also a period cost.

6 0
3 years ago
What was Thomas Malthus’s theory of population growth?
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

A population would grow faster than its ability to feed itself.

Explanation:

Thomas Malthus' theory, in my personal beliefs, is remarkably accurate and quite rational. He argued that if one were to have a country/population left unchecked, as in without any form of administration, government, or central authority to balance it, that a population would thus outgrow its resources and thus result in overpopulation and a lack of necessities... something that may, perhaps, lead to eventual extinction.

This is fairly factual when you think of the contemporary age. The earth was previously believed to have a carrying capacity of about 2-40 billion people, an argument that eventually centered on around 7 billion. Today, the earth's maximum carrying capacity is generally percieved to be about 9 billion people. In this age, we currently are nearing 8 billion.

This. Is. An. Issue.

A plethora of earth's resources that life itself depends on is LIMITED. Our freshwater reserves are limited. The amount of animals on this planet, a source of food, is <em>also </em>limited. The amount of plants on this planet, significant sources of energy, food, oxygen, and all sorts of natural processes that keep everything alive, are, unfortunately, limited.

This demands that humans figure a way to require less of these precious resources, fast. By the year of 2150, we'll likely have surpassed our carrying capacity.

For the issue of food, there are options. The primary issue is that humans are omnivores, as in, we love both plants AND animals... in our stomach's, of course. A prime example is myself! Personally, I couldn't live without beef, but I <em>definitely </em>couldn't or wouldn't want to survive without spinach and broccoli, because they are absolutely delicious.

However, despite humans being omnivores, we stubbornly refuse to eat our veggies. . . meaning a mass majority of us prefer to eat meat. We breed our animals to have offspring, giving us more meat. We generically enhance or even create our meat. We love meat.

The issue being that meat is a terrible source of energy. Remember, energy comes from sources of life itself, like the sun! PLANTS take the mass majority of this energy in, not animals. Animals EAT the plants, to where as much as 80% of that initial energy source is lost, disappearing into nothing, and meaning only roughly 20% is absorbed into the animal upon eating the said plant. Then, and only then, HUMANS come to eat the animal, in which 80% of that initial 20% is also lost between these stages.

As you can see, humans end up with barely any amount of this vital energy, simply because we love meat. We feed the plants to the animals to keep them healthy so WE can then eat the said animals, thus resulting in a HUGE loss of energy. We use our land for pastures. We give other resources (like water) to the animals, again, so we can eventually consume them.

The earth is going to run out of resources at one point or another, but our current consumption habits will likely hasten this process as far as freshwater and food.

Ofc, it shouldn't need to be said that if we were ALL to switch to primarily plant-only consumption, we'd probably be set. Getting rid of all our pastures and replacing them with massive farms would give is a surplus of plants, which are remarkably better sources of energy and will thus be able to sustain humans much, much longer. We won't have to worry as much about starving.

Then again, you must ALSO worry about the fragility of plants. They can easily be detroyed by natural disastors and are dependant upon environmental conditions such as weather temperature, climate, and soil. These factors are very limiting, but then you must additionally remember the amount of care they require, as well as they are extremely vunerable to mass destruction (like droughts, burning, flooding, etc., which can wipe out a LOT at once).

Obviously it's a give-or-take thing.

Malthus said it right, three hundred years ago.

I get the length of this post was probably uneccesary but you asked a very good question that gave me an excuse to cover something in-depth.

I am inevitable.

~Troy

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose you deposit $1,091.00 into an account 6.00 years from today that earns 12.00%. It will be worth $1,728.00 _____ years fr
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

It will take 10.058 years from today.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Present value= $1,091

Future value= $1,728

Interest rate= 12%

<u>First, we need to calculate the number of years it will take to transform the PV into the FV:</u>

<u></u>

n= ln(FV/PV) / ln(1+i)  

n= ln(1,728/1,091) / ln(1.12)

n= 4.058 years

It will take 10.058 years from today.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Nu-Tek is expanding rapidly. As a result, the company expects to pay annual dividends of $.62, .80, and $1.05 per share over the
    6·1 answer
  • The market for land is competitive and in equilibrium at the rental rate of $500 per acre and the supply of land is perfectly in
    5·1 answer
  • Professionals' liability for injuries caused by their negligence is referred to as _____. question 4 options: misrepresentation
    10·1 answer
  • You are interested in hiring an ergonomics consultant to evaluate your employees' desks and chairs. You research four consultant
    8·1 answer
  • Hardware is adding a new product line that will require an investment of $ 1 comma 450 comma 000. Managers estimate that this in
    5·1 answer
  • A project will produce cash inflows of $5,400 a year for 3 years with a final cash inflow of $2,400 in Year 4. The project's ini
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose that the federal government places a binding price floor on chocolate. To help support the price floor, the government p
    10·1 answer
  • Do managers manage differently based on where they are in the organization​
    10·1 answer
  • An increase in consumer expenditures during the holiday season, a decrease in purchases of U.S. goods by foreigners, a tax incre
    15·1 answer
  • The term _____ refers to a business's obligation to maximize its positive impact and minimize its negative impact on society.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!