Please Help Thank You I will reward brainliest
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I used calculus for this, as I'm not sure there's any other way to do it and to do it as easily. This is the volume of a solid found by using the disk method of rotation:
where R(x) is the outer shell of the solid and r(x) is the space inbetween the solid and the axis of rotation. There is no space between the solid and the axis of rotation, so r(x) = 0. R(x) is the height of the solid which is 3. Therefore, f(x) = 3 and that's the function we put into the formula with the lower bound of 3 and the upper bound of 5:
and
and integrating:
and using the First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:
V = π(9(5) - 9(3)) and
V = π(45 - 27) so
V = 18π units cubed or in decimal format,
V = 56.549 units cubed