C. they didn't think he was doing enough to help people.
This question refers to the essay "The Idea of America" by Hannah-Jones. In this essay, Jones talks about the way Black people experienced, and impacted, the Revolutionary War in the United States. She tells us that:
<em>"...as the sociologist Glenn Bracey wrote, ‘‘Out of the ashes of white denigration, we gave birth to ourselves.’’ For as much as white people tried to pretend, black people were not chattel. And so the process of seasoning, instead of erasing identity, served an opposite purpose: In the void, we forged a new culture all our own."</em>
The explanation the author gives in this text expands on the quote by describing how Black people were able to develop their own selves. We learn that Black people were considered "chattel" and that they were denigrated, minimized and ignored constantly. However, this did not lead to the erasure of their culture. Instead, out of these harsh experiences, Black people were able to create their own identity in a way that continues to our day.
I think it should be because diplomats is the representative of a nation and negotiating with other nations could be more easier if we're already friendly with the diplomat. Also the way we treat their diplomat is also the way of how we treat the nation he/she representing and it would add a good standing in the global status if we are respecting the diplomats.
<span>The Korean War had its immediate origins in the collapse of the Japanese empire at the end of World War II in September 1945
</span>
Consequently the allies decided to divide the territory, into two halves along the 38th parallel, with an ultimate aim of reunification, which was not forthcoming. The northern unpopular regime decided to initiate the agreement and the war broke.
<span />
It was one of the first revolutions of its kind to occur non-violently, making it 'glorious'.
