Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
They trained their armies very well so they would be ready for another war like WWII if one happened again.
Answer:
Waldorf education cultivates morality through a heavy reliance on art, take in facing the problems of our dwelling together on one planet-the moral direction that the spiritual and republican influences on the establishment of ours.
Explanation:
Answer:
Stone
Explanation:
I would say stone because diversity fits the one above it and it makes more sense then stone does in the sentence.
