Answer:
Regression to the mean fallacy
Step-by-step explanation:
It assumes that something has returned to normal because of corrective actions taken while it was abnormal. This fails to account for natural fluctuations. It is frequently a special kind of the post hoc fallacy.
<u>Use the previous given coordinates to solve for B.
Y=mx+b,
(3)=1/6(12)+b
3= 2+b
3-2=b
1=b
</u>
Answer:
The graph has a removable discontinuity at x=-2.5 and asymptoe at x=2, and passes through (6,-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
A rational equation is a equation where

where both are polynomials and q(x) can't equal zero.
1. Discovering asymptotes. We need a asymptote at x=2 so we need a binomial factor of

in our denomiator.
So right now we have

2. Removable discontinues. This occurs when we have have the same binomial factor in both the numerator and denomiator.
We can model -2.5 as

So we have as of right now.

Now let see if this passes throught point (6,-3).


So this doesn't pass through -3 so we need another term in the numerator that will make 6,-3 apart of this graph.
If we have a variable r, in the numerator that will make this applicable, we would get

Plug in 6 for the x values.



So our rational equation will be

or

We can prove this by graphing
108 divided by 3 equals 36.
I got this answer by multiplying 3 and 36, which equaled 108. Then I figured out that 108 divided by 3 equals 36!
Answer:
75% off
Step-by-step explanation:
I would personally say use a calculator, but whatever your instructor says.
First, do $600 off. You could also do 75% off first, but you choose. If you subtract $600 from $868, you get $268.
Next, do 75% off. If you take 100% - 75%, you get 25%, or 1/4. Multiply $868 by 1/4 and you get $217, which is the better deal.
So, to conclude, $217 is less than $268, and therefore 75% off is the better deal.