Answer: b. The company will be flooded with applications from individuals who are barely qualified.
Explanation:
By putting job advertisements on popular websites which are full of people looking for jobs, the company will attract people who are underqualified but apply anyway on the off chance that they are called for an interview. The company will incur costs sifting through the applications to find suitable candidates.
This will be a waste of the company's resources as those resources could have been directed at getting prospective employees that would be a better fit with the company and have the relevant qualifications. This could have been done by going to a recruiting agency for instance.
Answer: Deficit; higher; a decrease
Explanation:
<em>The term crowding-out effect refers to a situation in which a government </em><em><u>deficit</u></em><em> results in</em><em><u> higher</u></em><em> interest rates, causing </em><em><u>a decrease</u></em><em> in private spending on investment and consumer durables.</em>
The Crowding-out effect is what happens when a Government increases its spending past its revenues and gets a budget deficit. In other to balance its books therefore it will borrow heavily.
If the Government is such a large one like the American Government or the British Government, the borrowing might be so large that it will have the effect of reducing the amount of loanable funds in the market thereby increasing the interest rates due to a reduced supply of loanable funds.
As there are now increased interest rates, it will be more expensive for companies to borrow to spend on investment or for consumers to spend on durables. It will have the effect of <em>crowding out</em> the private sector.
Answer:
D) $1.00
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.
If I buy a cappuccino, I have forgone the opportunity to buy Russian tea cakes. Therefore, my opportunity cost is the price of Russian tea cakes.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
The Dominant Strategy in a game is the strategy that a player will choose that will provide them with the highest payoff regardless of what the other player does.
In the above, the dominant strategy will be for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT.
By choosing left Raphael makes a payoff of 4 if Susan picks Left as well and a Payoff of 6 if Sudan picks Right. This is better than him picking Right and he will get a Payoff of 3 if Susan chooses Right as well.
The Nash Equilibrium is the strategy where both are making the best that they can given the strategy of the other player and deviating from it will give them less pay out.
The dominant strategy therefore is for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT and for SUSAN to choose RIGHT.
This is because Raphael will pick Left as it maximises their payoff and Susan will then pick a strategy that gives her the highest payoff based on Raphael's decision which is to go RIGHT.
