<span>When downsizing employee the most effective method I feel will be to based the decision on facts or documented evidence that may be difficult to dispute. The source of data can be used maybe the last few performance appraisal results, absenteeism , productivity rate and other soft skills to measure suitability to the job. Create a matrix identifying the criteria and measure the grade of each employee based on the criteria. In a way this is a measured evaluation.
The least effective i would think are those decisions based on emotional considerations.</span>
Answer: This is called <u>Self-interest bias</u>.
Explanation:
When someone is using this type of bias they are doing it for their own self interest. They will use all information gathered to use the information that will benefit themselves and their interests. This can be considered unethical in some types of businesses. The person using self interest bias will try to blame others for any failures that they may have. They may also refuse to take personal responsibility in any situation.
These are three other types of bias;
- Selection bias
- Information bias
- Confounding
Today's share price for CCN is $16.67
Today's share price for CCN can be determined using the Gordon constant dividend growth model
The Gordon growth model is used to determine the value of the share of a firm using the value of its dividend with the assumption that the firm grows at a constant rate.
The formula of the Gordon constant dividend growth model :
price = d1 / (r - g)
d1 = next dividend to be paid = $0.50
r = cost of equity = 12%
g = growth rate = 9%
0.50 / (12% - 9%)
0.50 / 3%
0.50 / 0.03
= $16.67
A similar question was answered here: brainly.com/question/15023105?referrer=searchResults
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the 
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B
