Answer:
increase
Explanation:
the law is indirectly proportional
The answer choice which shows the Wegman's motivating factor which is an intrinsic motivator is:
- a. A sense of pride from meeting customer needs
<h3>What is a motivating factor? </h3>
This refers to the things which makes a person behave in a certain way with the aim of getting a reward.
<h3>What is Intrinsic Motivation? </h3>
This refers to the pleasures gotten from performing a task or doing a certain action which is for fun, rather for external motivation like money or other rewards.
Therefore, we can see that from Wegman's policy, he was able to get intrinsic motivation from meeting the customer's needs which gave him a sense of pride.
Read more about motivation here:
brainly.com/question/6853726
Answer:
Investor
Explanation:
A stock is a speculation. At the point when you buy an organization's stock, you're buying a little bit of that organization, called an offer. Investors buy stocks in organizations they think will go up in esteem. On the off chance that that occurs, the organization's stock increments in esteem also.
Investor is a person who purchase shares of a company in the market.
The correct answer is Only (A) and (C) are true
Explanation:
In a study or research, the control group is the one that does not receive a treatment. This means, in this case, the control group includes those who only drink the green tea without the herbs because they serve as a standard to measure the effects of the herbs. This makes statement A (The "only green tea" group serves as the control group) true; also, the group receiving the herbs is the experimental group.
On the other hand, a double-blind study is one in which the researchers and the participants ignore who is receiving the treatment, which guarantees there is objectivity. This occurs in the study presented because neither the researcher nor the subjects known who received the herbal mix. Thus, statement C (This study is double-blind) is true.
Finally, a study is classified as observational if there is not intervention but the researchers just observe participants to study a phenomenon. This does not occur in the study presented because there is an intervention through the herbal treatment, and therefore the study is not observational.
Answer: Jose has to pay $600.
Explanation:
Jose has to pay $600 to Jane for her inconvenience.
In Accordance with Coase theorem, when two conflicting parties exist, one has to ‘buy the right’ from the other party.
Which In this scenario or case, Jane has the ‘right to prevent Jose from having a dog’.
Thus, Jose has to pay compensation to Jane so that he can keep his dog and at the same time Jane is also compensated for the inconvenience which may arise later.
