I would say A) evolving attitudes of the public, D) current events, and E) ideologies of individual justices.
I don't think B is correct because the judicial branch is supposed to act as a check against the executive branch and therefore cannot be instructed to rule a certain way by any president, and I don't think C is correct because changes to the bill of rights would have less impact on interpretation of the constitution and more of an impact on the constitution/law itself
A major problem for the United States after the Revolutionary War (1775-1783) was that tens of thousands of Loyalists, due to the climate of violence and fear that still existed after the conflict (particularly in the South), fled the country, retreating with the British army to Britain and other parts of the British Empire (Jamaica, Bahamas, India) and also to Canada, settling primarily in the regions of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Since those Loyalists were often wealthy and educated, and they had been part of the thriving and cohesive upper class that controlled much of the industry and the commerce in areas such as New York or Boston, the social structure of the colonies changed significantly after their departure.
The election of Andrew Jackson dramatically changed the US for several different reasons including:
1) He was an advocate for the "average citizen"- Andrew Jackson was dubbed the "Champion of the Common Man." He received this title because he was not an inherently wealthy man nor was he part of a family that was consistently in politics. Rather, he came from humble beginnings. This story inspired many American citizens.
2) His policies resulted in increased democracy in the US- Jackson helped to get rid of property qualifications and other restrictions to ensure that white farmers had the right to vote, regardless of how much property they owned.
