Answer:
Both are correct
Explanation:
It is nature-nurture controversy or debate which focuses on an individual's personal behavioral traits to be a product or result of either genetics inheritance or acquired influences.
On one side, some psychologist and other natural sciences argue that behavioral traits and characteristics of a person can be explained by genetics as nature is per- wiring.
On the other hand, other social sciences and sociologist argues that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction and nurture.
Thus both genetics and human interaction and environment contributes to the human behavior.
Therefore, both the views are correct.
At the time of World War I, the US Army was small compared with the mobilized armies of the European powers. As late as 1914, the Regular Army had under 100,000 men, while the National Guard (the organized militias of the states) numbered around 115,000. The National Defense Act of 1916 authorized the growth of the Army to 165,000 and the National Guard to 450,000 by 1921, but by 1917 the Army had only expanded to around 121,000, with the National Guard numbering 181,000.
The answer is going to be true
The human body as you would expect, it produces free
radicals and the antioxidants to counter their harmful properties. But,
sometimes free radicals outnumbers the naturally occurring antioxidants. For it
to sustain the stability, a constant source of external foundations of
antioxidants is required in order to gain the extreme welfares of antioxidants.
Antioxidants gives benefit to the body by counteracting and eradicating the
free radicals from the bloodstream of our body.
They were able to have control over Spain and allowing Carthage to retain only its territory in North Africa. Hope this helps.
