Answer:
price floor , binding
price ceiling binding
price floor , non binding
Explanation:
A price floor is when the government or an agency of the government sets the minimum price of a product. A price floor is binding if it is set above equilibrium price.
Price ceiling is when the government or an agency of the government sets the maximum price for a product. It is binding when it is set below equilibrium price
Because firms are unable to hire workers due to the minimum wage laws., it means it is binding price floor
Equilibrium price is $3 and the maximum price is $2.70 . Thus, it is a binding price ceiling
Equilibrium price is $3 and the minimum price is $2.70 . Thus, it is a binding floor
Answer:
Find attached complete part of the question.
The unrealized gains is $3500
Explanation:
Y stock has been disposed and its gains or losses are now realized, and it is not applicable to our computation now.
Unrealized gains or losses is the difference between purchase price of a stock and its current market price
Stock X=($43-$40)*1500=$4500 gains
Stock Z=($21-$22)*1000=-$1000 losses
So unrealized gains overall =$4500-$1000
unrealized gains =$3500
Note that the price of stock X has risen to $43 from initial $40 while that of company Z has fallen to$21 from the initial $22.
I
The answer to this question is Transformational
leaders.
<span>Transformational leaders are leaders who inspire
their subordinates / followers by being a role model in order for the members
or followers to enhance their performance. Transformational leaders increase
the morale of the members by creating a vision for them to be guided and
inspire the members to do their best and be motivated always.</span>
Answer: Mirror image rule
Explanation:
It should be noted that the contract formation defenses are fraud, illegality, incapacity, unconscionability, duress and statute of Frauds.
The mirror image rule is not among the defense to the formation of w contract. It implies that an offer should be accepted with no changes made to the offer.
The annual premium that would result in Stephanie's annual out-of-pocket expense that is about the same as her current plan is <em>b. $0. 28 per $100 of value.</em>
Data and Calculations:
Home value = $355,000
Annual premium rate = $0.42 per $100
Deductible $500
Total annual out-of-pocket expense = $1,991 ($355,000 x 0.0042 + $500)
New deductible = $1,000
New annual premium rate = $0.28
Total annual out-pocket expense based on the new premium rate = $1,994 ($355,000 x 0.0028 + $1,000)
Thus, the annual premium that would result in Stephanie's annual out-of-pocket expense that is about the same as her current plan is <em>Option b.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/18618915
