Answer:
B) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question his attitude change is best explained by cognitive dissonance. This is defined as the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change. Which is exactly what Fernando is experiencing.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:contact the psychiatrist for initiation of commitment proceedings.
Explanation:
This proceeding may legally order a person to receive psychiatric treatment at the hospital because the person is seen to may be danger to themselves and suspected that they may commit harm against their own body.
Some people may refuse treatment because they don't feel like they need the treatment and believe there is nothing wrong with them hence an initiation of commitment proceeding may be crucial to give them the help that they actually need.
A person who says they wish to end it all may end up taking their own lives if they are not admitted to a psychitric treatment.
Answer:
C seems the most reasonable
It should be noted that corporate officers have the implied power to bind the firm in matters directly connected to its business.
<h3>Who are corporate officers?</h3>
corporate officers serves as those workers in a company or an organization who are seen as officials and they have allocated duties and responsibilities .
These officers posses the power to bind the firm in matters directly connected to its business.
Learn more about corporate officers at,;
brainly.com/question/24518056
Answer: $1381400
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Company A is considering a merger with Company B and that A has 43,000 shares outstanding at a market price of $32 a share while B has 12,800 shares outstanding priced at $44 a share and the merger is expected to create $5,400 of synergy.
The total value of the merged firm will be:
= (43,000 × $32) + (12,800 × $44) + $5,400 - $563,200
= $1,376,000 + $563,200 + $5,400 - $563,200
= $1,944,600 - $563,200
= $1,381,400