1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
2 years ago
12

The move over law applies not only to police and fire vehicles but also to ___________ .

Social Studies
2 answers:
zimovet [89]2 years ago
8 0
<span>The move over law applies not only to police and fire vehicles but also to </span>tow trucks.
lina2011 [118]2 years ago
8 0
It also applies to tow trucks
You might be interested in
The automobile engine is the largest source of _____ gas.
yawa3891 [41]
The automobile engine is the largest source of **<span>carbon monoxide**</span>  gas.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer needed ASAP!
Jet001 [13]

There are three advantages and two disadvantages in collaboration.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • In the workplace, many people can work.
  • They can share a lot of key ideas, new projects, and innovative approaches.
  • So there are some advantages and disadvantages are present.
  • They must overcome all the conflicts to the success of the project.
  • First, the advantage is the way the work is divided.
  • It depends upon the size of the project.
  • Second, the advantage is a sense of creativity.
  • It is used to know the visibility and quality of the products.
  • Third, the advantage is increased employee morale.
  • The two disadvantages are conflicts among workers and leadership among workers.
3 0
3 years ago
Coverage of presidential campaigns tends to be relatively unbiased because
VLD [36.1K]
Well firstly that is a wrong question.

But to answer it, it is because of the gravity of the issue, the presidency is the highest office in the land, it has to be fair
8 0
3 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
2 years ago
Which cause and effect diagram best illustrates one main affect of inform citizens on the political system
Yanka [14]

From the diagram given the correct answer is C. Due to the fact that it describes the effect if the citizens who are voting are informed. We found out that some politicians have the ability to trick people in order to make them vote for their proposes. But if every voter knows what the real intention of the officials is, they will be held accountable for that.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Understanding and taking advantage of the flood cycles of the Nile River allowed the ancient Egyptians to
    13·1 answer
  • Read these stanzas from Edna St. Vincent Millay's poems.
    7·2 answers
  • It is often helpful to discuss the situation with your supervisor when facing an ethical dilemma because ethical decisions will
    11·1 answer
  • Fill in the blanks <br> For all the questions
    6·1 answer
  • The nurse has received a report from unlicensed assistive personnel in relation to the morning vital signs. Which statement woul
    9·1 answer
  • Financial Wizard, whose office was in New York City, scammed billions of dollars from investors in a vast securities fraud schem
    13·1 answer
  • What do u think might attract or repel due to electric forces.
    15·2 answers
  • 10. We added wheels to our bureau to create less when we move it.​
    7·1 answer
  • Which is not one of the four pillars of democracy?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the the United States need to compromise" in adding states to the Union?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!