The New Deal was a series of domestic programs enacted in The United States in order to fight the Great Depression. It is often considered as an example of successful reform of the capitalistic system, although the recovery of American economy was pretty slow. It actually completely recovered during the war due to massive production of weapons. a. The relief was indeed one of the goals of the first part of the New Deal, and it was successful, since many unemployed persons were put to work on a wide range of government financed public works projects. b. The reform was based on the idea that the government intervention was <span>necessary to rationalize and stabilize the economy. But, these interventions worsened the Depression. d. Today, there is still the Social Security Act, which was invented within the New Deal. There is also the Tennessee Valley Authority, which was formed to modernize very poor regions, such as Tennessee.</span>
Answer:
C) Leading
Explanation:
Leading is the ability of a manager to be able to motivate employees to meet the organizational goals. This is done by using his influence or a reward system. Ronnie motivates his employees by using his influence, the congratulatory message motivates them to meet their targets. It is a principal role for managers to be able to motivate their employees to meet set goals.
I think the answer to this question is mountains
Answer:
Sounds like The Unknown behavior an There out look on life an The Control of the Nation That have an is taken folks Souls to destroy there I&M And making wicked an Nafarin Controlled choices against one another
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
