1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
5

Which court case strengthened Congress by providing for a broad interpretation of the commerce clause?

Social Studies
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Gibbons v. Ogden.

Explanation:

Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.

You might be interested in
Which of the following events are examples of the positive effects that can result from racial and ethnic blending? i. Strong te
aleksley [76]

Answer:

The correct answer is C. II and III

Explanation:

C is correct because in here we have examples of tolerance and mutual respect, which is a basis for a normal mutual cohabitation.

Options I and IV are negative effects, because they are showing violence and tensions, which are not positive effects.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the October Crisis of 1970, given the challenges of the situation, were there any other ways the Canadian government coul
coldgirl [10]

The October Crisis began at 8:15 a.m. on Oct. 5, 1970, at the home of the British trade commissioner in Montreal, James Cross.

Two members of the Libération cell of the Front de libération du Québec knocked at his door, disguised as delivery men. Admitted to the house by a maid, they pulled their guns and kidnapped him.

By the time the crisis ended on Dec. 28, Quebec labour minister Pierre Laporte had also been kidnapped and then murdered, the national government of Pierre Trudeau had invoked the first peacetime use of the War Measures Act - suspending Canadians' civil liberties - and the army had been deployed in Ottawa and throughout Quebec.

Canadians watching their television screens saw every appearance of a country under martial law. Tanks were on the lawns of Parliament. Hundreds of union leaders, artists, scholars, students and other political activists in Quebec were rounded up by police, arrested and detained without charge. The mayor of Vancouver tried to employ the security regulations to clear the city's beaches of hippies.

Forty years later, the legacy of the October Crisis challenges the notion of who we think we are.

The steps taken under the aegis of the War Measures Act - overwhelmingly supported by both French- and English-speaking Canadians - remain a symbol of the country's fragile attachment to civil liberties and human rights, with echoes along the road from anti-terror legislation in the wake of 9/11 and the policing of the streets of Toronto during the G20 summit.

Despite the Charter of Rights and Freedoms being cherished as a symbol of national identity, it is the mantra of Canada's first Constitution of 1867 - "peace, order and good government" - that appears to trump all other mythologies of the country that Canadians want.

"They like peace and they like order," says Ramsay Cook, one of Canada's greatest historians. "I don't think this has ever been a country that had an enormous interest in civil rights."

The imposition of the War Measures Act indelibly stained the stature of Mr. Trudeau as a civil libertarian and advocate of democracy - even though it was done at the request of Quebec's premier Robert Bourassa and Montreal's mayor Jean Drapeau.

Recent scholarship by, among others, historian John English, author of an exhaustive two-volume Trudeau biography, has lent support to the former prime minister's declaration that he acted to deal with an apprehended insurrection. Yet his response of "Just watch me" to a CBC reporter who asked him how far he would go to defeat the FLQ was tied to him for the rest of his life, and ignited a still-ongoing debate over whether the act's application was justified.

3 0
3 years ago
____________ refers to the words and nonverbal methods a person uses to communicate ideas.
nexus9112 [7]

Verbal communication refers to the words and nonverbal methods a person uses to communicate ideas.

<h3>What is verbal communication?</h3>

Verbal communication is a sort of oral communication in which the message is communicated by speaking the words out loud. Here, the sender verbalizes his emotions, ideas, and viewpoints in the form of speeches, dialogues, presentations, and conversations.

The speaker's tone, voice clarity, loudness, pace, body language, and the caliber of the words used in the conversation all affect how well they communicate verbally. Since the message is simultaneously sent and received by the sender and recipient in the case of vocal communication, the response is immediate.

The speaker must maintain a loud, clear voice that is heard to everyone, and the topic must be chosen with the target audience in mind. To make sure the communication is received exactly as intended, the sender should always double-check with the recipient. Such communication is more prone to mistakes since words may not always be enough to convey a person's thoughts and feelings.

To learn more about the, verbal communication visit:

brainly.com/question/27876354

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
Psychological scientists base their conclusions on evidence. They collect and use data to develop, support, or challenge a theor
Alona [7]

Answer: Empiricism

Explanation: Empiricism is a theory based on the use of empirical evidence. Empirical evidence refers to the use of scientific methodology and research using related data to establish conclusion or fact about an hypothesis. Empiricism negates the use of traditional, natural ideas which are based on priori reasoning, religious sentiments and intuitions. Empiricism revolves around the use of data and scientific research in establishing facts.

4 0
3 years ago
Write the negation, contrapositive, converse, and inverse for the following statement. (Assume that all variables represent fixe
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

Negation = Pn ¬q

Contrapositive = ¬q = ¬p

Converse = q=p

Inverse = ¬p = ¬q

Explanation:

If today is new year's, then tomorrow is January.

Let P = If today is new year's eve

q = tomorrow is January

Negation of q = ¬q

The statement is represented as P=q

Negation ; today is new year's eve (p), then tomorrow is not January (¬q)

Negation = Pn ¬q

Contrapositive ; If tomorrow is not January (¬q), then today is not new year's eve(¬p)

¬q = ¬p

Converse ; If tomorrow is January, then today is new year's eve i.e if q then p

= q=p

Inverse ; if today is not new year's eve, then tomorrow is not January

if not p, then not q ; ¬p = ¬q

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • ake told Mary that he would call her before lunch. At 11:30 a.m. the phone rang and she responded to the male voice by saying "H
    13·1 answer
  • While some food preferences remain deeply embedded in culture, there is plenty of evidence that global dietary preferences are c
    14·1 answer
  • I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!! <br> Short answers would be appreciated! (:
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Allied leaders meet in 1943 to make plans for the post-war world?
    8·1 answer
  • When choosing to purchase and use home fitness equipment, you must commit to __________. A. allocating space in your house B. co
    12·1 answer
  • The energy derived from the digestion of food is __________.
    13·2 answers
  • How can education address the class divide​
    5·1 answer
  • How old do you have to be to buy non alcoholic beer
    11·1 answer
  • Servers that exist within a data center that is publicly accessible on the internet are referred to as on-premises servers. true
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!