Answer:The higher the education the higher chance of that person voting
Explanation:
Sherif's work on the autokinetic effect primarily demonstrates the power of <u>social roles</u>, and Asch's studies on line judgments demonstrate the power of <u>normative influence</u>.
Sherif's experiment showed group norms are set up through interaction of people and the leveling-off of excessive opinions. The end result is a consensus agreement that tends to be a compromise...even if it is wrong.
Muzafer Sherif performed a conventional look at on conformity in 1935. Sherif put subjects in a dark room and instructed them to look at a pinpoint of mild and say how a long way it moved. Psychologists had formerly discovered a small, unmoving light in a darkish room might appear to be transferring. This changed into categorized the autokinetic effect.
Sherif's work counseled that our information of the arena was encouraged by means of others within the absence of goal cues. Asch suggested that even with the physical cues, our perception of the arena is colored with the aid of others (or as a minimum our verbal behavior concerning the perception of the arena is colored by the group).
Learn more about Psychologists here: brainly.com/question/12011520
#SPJ4
Wind<span> abrades rock by sandblasting, this is the process in which wind causes the blowing off millions of grains of sand, which bumps across the surface of rocks' surface. it can also happen due to deflation, which is when wind removes the top layer of fine sediment/soil to cause desert pavement.
</span>Glaciers, however, abrade rock by simply using Gravity. when enough ice builds up on a slope, the ice begins to move downhill. The steeper the slope, the faster the glacier. As glaciers move forward, the material that they picked up scratch and abrade the rock and soil underneath the glacier, which causes erosion<span>.</span>
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
they don't
Explanation:
I'm a child and I get spanked and I never learn
Answer:
Emily's opportunity cost of producing 1 milkshake is 1 ice cream sundae.
Ben's opportunity cost of producing 1 milkshake is 0.5 ice cream sundae.
Explanation:
Both Emily and Ben own an ice cream parlor.
In an hour Emily can produce 40 milkshakes or 40 ice cream sundaes.
Emily's opportunity cost of producing a milkshake is
= 
= 
= 1 ice cream sundae
In an hour Ben can produce 20 milkshakes or 10 ice cream sundaes.
Ben's opportunity cost of producing a milkshake is
=
= 
= 0.5 ice cream sundae
We see that Ben has a lower opportunity cost of producing milkshake, so we can say that he has a comparative advantage in producing milkshake.
