Answer: He conveys that many different arguments can be presented against socialism.
Explanation: The rest don’t make sense, there is no process nor is it in order of importance. The next option says each point is a logical result of the previous one but each of the arguments don’t seem to connect to the previous.
The monster sees his family escape their cottage, so he burns it down and goes to live off of the land.
<h3>Why does the monster choose to help the family he stays with?</h3>
The monster learns the French language from the home and practices those words by himself. Desiring to keep his cottagers happy, the monster becomes an aid to the family by secretly hauling wood to the cottage and completing repairs, all under the cover of darkness.
<h3>Why did the monster burn the cottage?</h3>
But by the time the monster gets the cottage, the De Laceys have moved out. He sees Felix completing his lease with the landlord, and never sees any of them again. His last link with society eliminated, the monster gives in to rage and a desire for revenge. He burns down the house and heads for Geneva and Victor.
To learn more about Frankenstein, refer
brainly.com/question/21437674
#SPJ9
c)
To inspire her subjects to battle an invading army.
C
Explanation: No citations should be used in a conclusion, crossing out B. A would be a good intro, and D would make a good body paragraph.
Answer:
"I took from my waistcoat-pocket a pen-knife, opened it, grasped the poor beast by the throat, and deliberately cut one of its eyes from the socket!"
