Which statement would a Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint most likely would agree with?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Gelneren [198K]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

B. The Supreme Court must be careful not to overstep its constitutional authority when overturning a law.

Explanation:

A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely try to remember the limitations that the Supreme Court is bound to. Therefore, it is more likely that this justice would be careful of not overstepping its constitutional authority when overturning a law. This, however, is not a universal view among justices.

Anastaziya [24]2 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is:

B. The Supreme Court must be careful not to overstep its constitutional authority when overturning a law.

You might be interested in

When the traffic light changed from red to green, the drivers on both sides of Leon's vehicle pulled quickly forward, giving Leo

Vilka [71]

Answer:

The answer is A) relative motion.

Explanation:

As the name suggests, relative motion refers to the perceived velocity of a point in relation to another.

Some more instances would be the perceived velocity of a car if you're standing the next to the road (the car moves fast), if you're driving a car and moving at the same speed (the other car appears static) or if you're driving the opposite direction (the other car appars to move at double the speed).

It's important to notice that relative motion can be positve or negative.

3 0

2 years ago

2. What is the matter with the following claim: "Doing the right thing depends on what you are thinking when you do it."

arlik [135]

Because "the right thing" is somewhat abstract, what can be right in a moment of anger? What is the parameter to measure if something is completely right or wrong?

There is nothing that is completely right at times when anything would be wrong.

6 0

3 years ago

"Made in the USA remains shorthand for reliability"

Gala2k [10]

The correct answers to these open questions are the following.

1. Do you think that the business executive who made this statement would be in favor of or against free trade? What makes you think so?

What I think is that times are changing and are very different from the time of "Made in America."

In this modern-time, globalization rules, and free trade are the direct consequence of globalization. Many American companies have decided to go abroad and built fabrics and industrial plants in other countries because in those developing countries they pay low salaries and can get more profits selling their products. American companies have been greedy too.

2. What do you feel about the number of imported items you can buy in stores? How might free trade affect these numbers?

As I mentioned above, it is part of free trade in a globalized world. Yes, the United States imports many things, but let's remember that the US also exports many goods to other countries. So this is call balance, in which countries negotiate to have a balance in trade. Countries export, yes, but they also have to import goods, so all the countries win.

The best example is the free trade agreement called NAFTA, now USMCA, between México, Canada, and the United States.

5 0

3 years ago

One way in which the colonists first protested unfair taxes was an a(n) ____________ of British goods where they refused to buy

Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

c, boycott. boycott means to abstain from something.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Approximately how many turkeys were purchased at Christmas 2013 in the UK; 1 million, 10 million, or 20 million?

lorasvet [3.4K]