Answer:
<em>Deception</em>
Explanation:
Deception
In research deception is a dishonest way of conduction research, in which the participants are given different information about a study. The participant of such research is not aware of the reason why such an analysis is carried out until the outcome is known. Deception in the researcher can also be intentionally withholding of some of the vital information needed for the participants to carry out the research effectively.
An illustration
Deception some times is used by the researcher to obtain accurate information. In our illustration, the researcher wants to study cheating, and he employs deception. The researcher opted for deception so that by withholding the true knowledge, the participants would act naturally. The above is a clear case of deception by the researcher
I believe the answer is: c. receive a great deal of publicity
Overturning hearing due to technological changes usually would make a lot of people that is charge with similar cases had the basis to reduce or eliminate their sentence. Because of the magnitude of the decision, reporters usually really interested in such cases.
I believe the answer is: <span>the matrifocal family
</span><span>the matrifocal family refers to a family structure when the mothers become the head of the family.
According to statistics, more than 65% of African American familes are supported by single mothers, and this would often cause a hard time for the single moms since they have to juggle between their career and taking care of their households.</span>
Answer:
a. Long Cycle Theory
Explanation:
In international relations theory, the Long Cycle Theory was first presented by George Modelski in his book <em>Long Cycles in World Politics</em> (1987). Modelski claims that <u>the US replacing Britain as the leader of the International System after World War II is part of a cycle in international relations where one hegemon is gradually replaced by another over a period of roughly a century</u>.
The transition from one hegemonic power to another leads to the new world power carrying on the costs associated with such a position. And unlike defenders of the realist school of international relations, Modelski doesn't see this cycle as produced by the anarchy of the internationals system, but rather as a natural consequence of economic and political developments, including wars. According to him, Portugal was the world hegemon in the 16th century, Netherlands in the 17th century, Britain stretched his period of international dominance over the 18th and 19th century, and since the 20th century, the United States is the world's dominant hegemon.
