Answer:
Yes, if we want a better world for all species and humans we should definitely change the way we view and treat animals. How we treat of animals reflects the way we think about them. When we humans condone, allow, support and/or profit from the imprisonment, subjugation and mass murder of animals, we are evidently not thinking about nor treating animals very well. A very big part of the problem is that we think of us humans as completely different/more important than animals allowing humans to convince them/ourselves that it is ok to use animals as resources, as objects.
I hope this helps :D
Answer:
C). The distance covered by Claire prior to 10 a.m. was 120 miles more than the distance covered by Elena prior to 10 a.m. After leaving Elena's house, Elena was on the road two hours more than Claire.
Explanation:
The third option correctly compares the distances covered by Claire and Elena. It aptly states that Claire covered a distance of 120 miles more than Elena before 10 a.m. as Claire begins her journey after 10 a.m. from 120 miles while Elena begins from 0(displayed in the paragraph). The next comparison is that Claire after 'leaving Elena's house', immediately begins her journey and covers 120 miles distance(total becomes 240) in the next two hours while Elena remains two hours on the road and begins her journey after that. Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
The question has two similar triangles. The triangles are isosceles.
In order for us to get the length of the sides of the other triangle, we can use ratio and proportion.
Triangle 1
side lengths = 24 mm
base length = 16 mm
Triangle 2
side lengths = ?
<span>base length = 11 mm
</span>
24 : 16 = X : 11
24 / 16 = X / 11
16X = 264
X = 16.5 mm
So the length of the equal-length side of the other triangle.
