Answer:
$400
Explanation:
From the question, there is a butterfly spread when a trader buys 100 options with strike prices $60 and $70 and sells 200 options with strike price $65.
The maximum gain is the point where both the stock price and the middle strike price are equal, i.e. equal to $65. At that point, the options payoffs are respectively $500, 0, and 0. By implication, the total payoff is $500.
The set up cost of the butterfly spread can be calculated as follows:
Setup cost = ($11×100) + ($18×100) – ($14×200)
= 1,100 + 1,800 – 2,800
Setup cost = $100
Net gain = Options payoffs – Setup cost = $500 - $100 = $400
Therefore, the maximum net gain (after the cost of the options is taken into account) is $400.
Answer:
The marginal revenue of the 21st driveway is: -$500. The right answer is C.
Explanation:
In order to calculate the the marginal revenue of the 21st driveway, we have to calculate first the total revenue from 20 driveways.
Total revenue from 20 driveways = 20×$10,000= $200,000
Next, we calculate the Revenue from 21 driveways = 21×$9,500 = $199,500
Therefore, The Marginal revenue from 21th driveways = =$199,500-$200,000 =-$500
Basically, the students would expect to pay the prices affixed in times of promotion. This is especially so if the promotions programs are done on a constant basis and if they result to massive interests in the products on offer.
In reality though, the students would have expected to pay the normal prices since promotions are temporary and can never and should never be used as a main selling strategy.
They won 21 out of their 30 basketball games.
Answer: No, because State A requires mutuality of parties in order for issue preclusion to apply
Explanation:
According to the information given, the federal court cannot grant the partial summary judgment motion. The reason for this is because State A requires mutuality of parties in order for issue preclusion to apply.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, it's required for the federal court to give full faith and credit to the state court judgments. Therefore, in this scenario, if a subsequent action in the state is barred by the state-court judgment, then it can be deduced that it acts to bar a subsequent action in the federal court too.
