Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because in order for everything to be organized you need to know how the system is running
Answer:
In this situation, most of the NASA workforce would still be composed of austronauts with jet fighter experience because they would be lured by the higher wages offered to them.
However, the difference would lie in that there would also be some austronauts without jet figther experience, who would still try to get into NASA, despite being offered lower wages.
This is a different situation to the current one, where jet fighter experience is an requirement to become a NASA austronaut, which means that those without this type of experience are barred from entering NASA, no matter how low of a wage they would be willing to take.
Based on what you have a degree on, where the company/business is, would you be happy with the amount of money you got, and would you be ok with what you're doing.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A moderately favorable situation in which Sharon’s relationships with her employees are strained, but where the employees are still doing highly structured tasks.
Explanation:
Austrian organizational psychologist Fred Fiedler (<em>1922-2017</em>) proposed in his Theory of Contingency that leaders only have one leadership style and that they cannot shape it according to the different situations they might be involved in. Instead, leaders must be located in a situation that matches their style.
Since Sharon's leadership style is <em>autocratic</em>, she is likely to manage herself better in adverse situations where the subordinates still follow her instructions.
