Answer:
d. $166,000
Explanation:
Under the weighted average method, cost to be accounted =
cost ending work in process inventory of $18,000 + cost of unit to be transfer out of $148,00
Answer:
The Company should Lease the equipment (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis on March 23 as to whether Casper Company should lease or sell the equipment.
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Lease Equipment (Alternative 1); Sell Equipment (Alternative 2) Differential Effect on Income (Alternative 2)
Revenues $285,200 $273,400 –$11,800
Costs –$15,100 –$8,202 $6,898
($273,400*3%=$8,202)
Income (Loss) $270,100 $265,198 $4,902
Therefore Based on the above Differential Analysis the Company should LEASE the equipment (Alternative 1).
Answer:
most likely will not be held responsible because of the business judgment rule.
Explanation:
A business judgement rule is a legal provision that protects the board of a company from frivolous legal actions as flregards its business decisions.
Boards of companies are assumed to act in good faith, within their fiduciary standards of loyalty, prudence and care that the board owes to shareholders.
It will have to be proven that the board blatantly violated a code of conduct, otherwise the court will review or question it's decisions.
Answer:
Cost of goods manufactured
Explanation:
Cost of goods manufactured are reported on the face of income statement because it's a critical factor in arriving at the profit or loss position at the end of a period. Cost of goods manufactured takes cognizance of the material costs, labour and overhead costs involved in production. This determines the overall financial status of a company, and allow a decision maker to know if the business is doing good or not.
Answer:
d.economic duress
Explanation:
The economic duress in simple terms means a party who is entering into a contract frightens or threatens of cancelling the contract or does not act according to the terms of the contract unless the other party in the contract agrees to their demands.
In the context, the conduct of Roger against Karl is probably can be called as the 'economic duress' as Roger informs Karl before the deadline of filing the response that he will not represent himself against IRS unless Karl enters into a deal of an expensive retainer agreement. Thus it is an economic duress that Roger is showing and forcing Karl to agree on his demands.