For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
He belongs to the top of the hierarchy of needs which is "Self actualization"
Answer:
This is best explained through the process called classical conditioning.
Explanation:
Classical conditioning is a learning process that involves an association between a stimulus and a response. In the example given in the question, the stimulus is the bottle, which was an indication that she would soon be fed, and it was paired with the excitement that she felt when eating (unconditioned response). Therefore, after the association is been made, the conditioned stimulus (the bottle), produces the now conditioned response (the excitment).
Answer:
The correct answer is B.bargain in order to obtain the property rights of the gopher habitat.
Explanation:
In economics, the Coase Theorem states that in a market where transaction costs are negligible, a dispute between parties where property rights are involved will lead to a bargaining process where the party that gives the most value to whatever it's in dispute will end up winning rights over that property. In this case, the environmental group assigns great value to protecting the habitat of the Wyoming pocker gopher, but they can only fully secure its well-being by securing property rights over said habitat, and given their standing, they can expect to bargain or negotiate successfully. Any other option, like protesting, boycotting, or lobbying, won't be good enough to achieve their goals.
