Answer: Walking Green is an example of a CITIZEN-ACTION PUBLIC.
A citizen action public can be defined as a situation or a scenario whereby the decision of a company is being challenged by the the public which can be the consumers or any group that contribute significantly to the marketing success of the company.
The act of Walking Green challenging Kelstone Developers is an act of citizen action public.
When a person experiences a period of euphoria, elevated self-esteem, increased talkativeness, enhanced energy and a decreased need for sleep it is termed as mania.
Mania is characterized by an excessive level of activity, energy, mood or conduct. This elevation must differ from how you typically behave and be apparent to others. Feelings of invincibility, sleep deprivation, rushed thoughts and ideas, fast speech and having erroneous beliefs or views are symptoms. The 3 stages of mania are: hypomania, acute mania and delirious mania. Mania is also divided into three categories: mixed states, hypomania and related diseases. With no known causes, manic episodes might cycle across several weeks or months.
A manic episode is when you have one or more mania symptoms and match the requirements for a manic episode. You might even need to be hospitalized in some circumstances.
To learn more about manic episode refer:
brainly.com/question/954972
#SPJ4
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
The answer to this question would be A and B.
