All categories

4 years ago

The use of simulation to create an aggregate plan:

Business

1 answer:

12345 [234]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Answer is option b i.e. will produce a plan that may not be the best plan.

Explanation:

Simulation is the technique used to create an artificial environment that is similar to the real-life situation to study various problems and how to tackle them. However, it is not the full proof plan which means it is based on certain probability and chances that a certain situation might arise. Many times situations are not as planned and here we cannot solely depend on the solution that we have learned during the simulation process. Therefore, the simulation will provide us with a plan that may or may not be the best plan.

You might be interested in

Prox Inc. is a U.S.-based manufacturer of consumer electronics. It decides to export to Mexico and wants to protect its goods ag

Alina [70]

Prox Inc. is a U.S.-based manufacturer of consumer electronics. It decides to export to Mexico and wants to protect its goods against damage, loss, and pilferage. The document which is applicable here is an A. insurance certificate.

Explanation:

A certificate of insurance is a document used to provide information on specific insurance coverage.
The certificate provides verification of the insurance and usually contains information on types and limits of coverage, insurance company, policy number, named insured, and the policies' effective periods
Certificate of Insurance is a summary document usually issued by an agent on behalf of an insurer that says a policy has been issued to an insured for a general type of risk.
The Certificate is usually issued to a third party who wants some evidence or assurance that a policy has been issued.
A certificate of insurance is requested when liability and large losses are a concern.
Most commercial leases require the tenant to provide certificates of insurance or other evidence of insurance. Certificates of insurance are typically issued by an agent or broker for the named insured and set forth the coverages written for the insured

5 0

4 years ago

What is the difference between risk and being risky

Sliva [168]

Answer:

Both risk and risky often connote a negative meaning of something related to or involving dangerous and perilous outcomes. Risky is the adjective form of the base word risk. The difference between risk and risky lies in their grammatical categories. The difference between risk and risky lies in their grammatical category. The key difference between risk and risky is that risk is a noun and the verb form whereas risky is the adjective form of the same word.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following communication styles includes the desire to avoid conflict but still tries to manipulate the situation so

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

☆Passive aggressive☆

Explanation:

•Passive Assertive: Not a communication style.

•Passive: Developed patterns of avoiding expresing feelings/ emotions.

•Aggressive: can involve manipulation or

intimidation to achieve an end goal.

6 0

3 years ago

Barbara desperately wants to be seen as professional by her coworkers. so, every morning before work, she carefully reviews her

sergey [27]

Barbara's behavior is trying to employ self fulfilling prophecy in which she tries fulfill her expectations in which she wants herself to be recognized by her co-workers as a professional. This usually happens with the person's beliefs or behavior that he or she is applying or the individual's way of doing, in hopes to make his or her beliefs to come true.

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Kaspar and Ludger, two unrelated calendar year corporations, have the following transactions for 2019: Kaspar Corporation Ludger

Karolina [17]

Answer:

The dividends received deduction for Kaspar Corporation is $70,000, while the dividends received deduction for Ludger Corporation is $230,000.

Explanation:

Note that the data in the question are merged together but they are first sorted in the attached excel file before answering the question as follows:

The dividends received deduction refers a federal tax deduction that are enjoyed in the U.S. by some corporations that receives dividends from related entities.

Based on the general rule for dividends received deduction, if the ownership by the company receiving the dividend in the company paying the dividend is less than 20%, the dividends received deduction is the 70% of the dividend received.

Since both Kaspar and Ludger have just 15% ownership which is less than 20% in domestic corporation from which they received dividends, their dividends received deduction can therefore be determined using the following formula:

Dividend received deduction = Dividend received * 70% .............. (1)

Using equation (1), we have:

Kaspar's dividend received deduction = $100,000 * 70% = $70,000

Ludger's dividend received deduction = $230,000 * 70% = $161,000

Therefore, the dividends received deduction for Kaspar Corporation is $70,000, while the dividends received deduction for Ludger Corporation is $230,000.

Download xlsx

8 0

3 years ago