Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
X-2y=5 ; 2x-4y=10
• x - 2y = 5 • 2x -4y = 10
-2y = -x+5 -4y= -2x +10
y1 = ½x - 5/2 y2 = ½x -5/2
• => y1 = y2
½x -5/2 = ½x -5/2
the systems have no solution
• graph as attached
740-707.60=32.40
707.60-675.20=32.40
675.20-642.80=32.40
so that means every month you are paying 32.40$ bill. to get how many months you can pay phonebills without depositing any more money devide the 740/32.40=22.83 but you can not pay bill for the 0.83 month so answer will be 22 months
Distribute the implied one, making it -8=-x-4 then add four to each side making it -4=-x divide by -1 and the answer will be 4=x
Add 2 to both sides
g + 2 = -2x
Divide both sides by -2
-g + 2/2 = x
Simplify g + 2/2 to 1 + g/2
-(1 + g/2) = x
Simplify brackets
-1 - g/2 = x
Switch sides
<u>x = -1 - g/2</u>