Answer:
Kodak missed the digital camera revolution that it started.
Explanation:
According to history, Kodak's Steve Sasson was the first to invent a digital camera prototype in 1975.
But, Kodak relied on its past successes to the extent that it could not see beyond its shoulders. Kodak spotted digital technology opportunity in its business, but it lacked the foresight to sharpen its core competency so that it could redefine the market and its business from a film producing and selling company to one that gives consumers the opportunity to share images online. It lacked the competency to understand the emerging needs of its customers and woefully failed to invest rightly in digital technology.
On the other hand, Fuji created new opportunities for itself that were related to its core business by branching into magnetic tape optics, videotape, copiers, and office automation. As a result, it overtook Kodak in market share while Kodak submerged into bankruptcy, from which it later emerged stronger better than it was before the bankruptcy but smaller.
Answer:
The amount of total stockholders’ equity reported on the balance sheet at month-end is $30,000.
Explanation:
Stockholders’ equity comprises retained earnings, common stock and any other statutory reserves. The retained earnings is the accumulation of net income or loss over years minus dividend paid while common stock is the value of the shares owned by the owners or the public and the owners are entitled to dividends.
The amount of total stockholders’ equity reported on the balance sheet at month-end is simply $5,000 + $25,000 = $30,000.
Answer:
The likely problems to be encountered by Roberts include the following below:
b. the operating characteristics of firms across different industries vary significantly resulting in very different ratio values.
d. caution must be exercised when comparing older to newer firms,
e.g., utility company vs. software company?
c. the four companies are in very different industries.
Explanation:
Answer:
If the new reforms bring increase confidence of the investors then the company will have to incur lower borrowing costs as the investor will be available and vice versa.
Explanation:
Suppose that previously our company's credit rating was overrated. Due to recent regulatory reforms, my company achieved a lower credit rating and hence the investor confidence in our company dropped significantly. Now the investor is not interested to invest in my company and to urge them to invest in the company, they will be offered higher interest. If the reforms are going to impact our credit rating adversely then the borrowing cost will increase and vice versa.
Furthermore, Core Principle 3 says that the decsion making of the investor is based on the information that is readily available to him. This means if the reforms increase the access of the borrower through improved credit rating then it will be favourable for the company in terms of lower borrowing costs. If the reforms decrease the access of the borrower through depreciating credit rating then it will adversely affect the company in terms of lower borrowing costs and lower investment access.
Answer:
Direct material quantity variance= $6,300 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct materials 2 grams $7.00 per gram
The company produced 4,600 units in January using 10,100 grams of direct material.
<u>To calculate the direct material quantity variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct material quantity variance= (standard quantity - actual quantity)*standard price
Direct material quantity variance= (2*4,600 - 10,100)*7
Direct material quantity variance= $6,300 unfavorable
