Answer:
determine purchase authority
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that David was not successful because he forgot to determine purchase authority. In other words he gave the presentation to someone (the receptionist) that does not have any authority to make purchases for the company and is why he was unsuccessful. David needed to find the individual in charge of buying the pharmaceuticals for the company and give him the presentation.
Answer:
a. Revenues - These will increase by $5 million to represent the entire value of the order.
b. Earnings. - Increase by $3 million
Earnings in this case are revenue less the cost of inventory which will be;
= 5 - 2
= $3 million
c. Receivables - Increase by $4 million
The customer paid $1 million upfront which means that they still owe $4 million out of the $5 million. This will go to the receivables account to show that the customer owes the business.
Answer:
Demand in developing countries is lower and so the price is set lower to match the capacity to pay (such as pharmaceuticals). Locally produced goods, especially the outputs of primary production are generally inexpensive and often will be cheaper in developing countries e.g. bananas.
Answer:
The option that maximizes Maggie's taste index is 1 snack bar and 2 ice creams
Explanation:
<u>snack bar</u> <u>ice cream</u>
37 grams 65 grams
120 calories 160 calories
5 grams of fat 10 grams of fat
Maggie wants to consume up to 450 calories and 25 grams of fat, but she needs at least 120 grams of dessert per day. Ice cream taste 95, snack bars 85.
- maximize taste index = [85(37X) + 95(65Y)] / (37X + 65Y)
- 5X + 10Y ≤ 25 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 1
- 120X + 160Y ≤ 450 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 2
- 37X + 65Y ≥ 120 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 3
- X ≥ 0 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 4
- Y ≥ 0 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 5
maximum possible combinations following constraint 1, 4 AND 5:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (5 + 20 = 25)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (10 + 10 = 20)
- option 3: 3 snack bars - 1 ice cream (15 + 10 = 25)
possible combinations following constraint 2:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (120 + 320 = 440)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (240 + 160 = 400)
possible combination following constraint 3:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (37 + 130 = 167)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (74 + 65 = 139)
since we only have two possibilities, we can calculate which one generates the highest taste index
maximize taste index = [85(37X) + 95(65Y)] / (37X + 65Y)
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams = [85(37) + 95(130)] / (37 + 130) = (3,145 + 12,350) / 167 = 92.78
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream = [85(74) + 95(65)] / (74 + 65) = (6,290 + 6,175) / 139 = 89.68
