The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant.
<h3>What are the responses about police misconduct?</h3>
The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant. This argument extends to rotten bushels-groups of officials banding together to commit deviant actions.
Most often when we listen about police misconduct, it's due to instances of extreme use of force, brutality, lawlessness, coercive interrogations, witness tampering, or racial profiling. These actions can result in physical harm or death, wrongful imprisonment, and infringement of constitutional rights.
Incidents of unethical or criminal misconduct can influence the officer's capability to testify in both criminal and civil trials. In addition, such incidents may result in direct civil liability for the agency and may impact the agency's capability to protect itself in other, irrelevant civil trials.
To learn more about police misconduct refer to:
brainly.com/question/15022635
#SPJ9
The new depressant released by the Wellness pharmaceuticals are known as lexabuzac is an example of a technological monopoly and Option D is correct.
<h3>What is a
monopoly?</h3>
A monopoly can be referred to as a situation where there is only a single seller in the market and that seller has full control over the price and production of the product in the market.
The launching of a new antidepressant requires special technological developments and these developments are shown by the wellness pharmaceuticals in launching lexabuzac.
Therefore, the new depressant released by the Wellness pharmaceuticals known as lexabuzac is an example of a technological monopoly, and Option D is correct.
Learn more about Monopoly here:
brainly.com/question/18452440.
Sawyer and Emily is so much yup that you guys have a lot to do for you
Answer:
The sender and receiver do not share overlapping frames of reference.
Explanation:
Communication is a two-way process. It requires a sender and a receiver. Also, both the sender and the receiver are required to possess certain things in common to help in the free flow of communication. Some of the common aspects include language, topic, and references. In the absence of these aspects, the communication fails. In the given situation, the same happens when Ed and the interior decorator. Both of them converse with each other about different topics. As a result, the information does not reach them in the way it should be.
This is true. The Chief Executive is the President of the United States of America. He is known as the Chief Executive because he is the head of the Executive branch of government. The United States government was formed with the principle of separation of powers in mind. This means that government power should not be centralized in just one official or one branch (like the British monarchy in the Medieval and Renaissance era). This is done to lessen the chance for abuse in the government. The executive branch is mainly concerned with the implementation of laws. The legislative is in-charge of writing and creating the national laws. The judiciary (courts) is primarily there as a check for the powers of the executive and legislative branch. They make sure both branches do not abuse their powers and gives citizens the avenue to air out their grievances.
