Answer:
7 years
Explanation:
45000(1.01)^28= roughly 60,000
28/4 (quarters) = 7 years
Techniques for compressing the schedule include Crashing and Fast Tracking. You use them to shorten your timetable and to meet a specific scheduling objective. Fast-tracking entails carrying out two tasks concurrently, even though they wouldn't typically be.
How does fast-tracking differ from crashing to compressing a project schedule?
In conclusion, the distinctions between crashing and fast tracking are as follows: Fast-tracking entails running tasks simultaneously, whereas crashing entails adding resources to a project. The increased danger is associated with quick tracking, but the increased expense is associated with crashes.
What limitations could there be with each of crashing and fast-tracking?
Fast-tracking is free but increases the risk associated with your project. Adding more resources to your project is referred to as "crashing." Having a crash costs more money. To compress your calendar the most while spending the least amount of money, you should crash such activities. method:
Learn more about crashing and fast-tracking methods: brainly.com/question/14478482
#SPJ4
Answer: None of these answer choices are correct.
Explanation:
Based on the information given, it should be noted that the separately reported change in 2021 earnings will be option D "None of these answer choices are correct".
We should note that the change in the depreciation method will be reported prospectively. Therefore isn't any separately reported change in the earnings.
Therefore, the correct option is D
Answer:
Sexual harassment is an unethical behavior both at or outside workplace and this can be explained using these ethical theories; DEONTOLOGY, UTILITARIANISM, INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER ETHICS, WORKPLACE INDIVIDUAL ETHICS
1. DEONTOLOGY: This ethical theory states that a person's actions are either bad or good depending on sets of rules, actions are morally right if it is in accordance with the rules, rights et cetera. in this case the behavior does not follow any rules and there is no right given to anybody to harass a woman. This theory shows that these acts were unethical.
2. UTILITARIANISM: this theory supports actions and behaviors that brings happiness and joy to others and frowns at actions that brings sadness and unhappiness to people around us. In this case the employee is harassed which makes her unhappy so this theory labels sexual harassment as an unethical behavior.
3. INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER ETHICS: It says that there are certain qualities of a person that determine their ethics, this includes; gratitude, benevolence, respect but in this case the individual has no such traits present in him because of his disrespect towards a woman, so this theory shows how unethical those acts were.
4. WORKPLACE INDIVIDUAL ETHICS: It says that the development or presence of certain traits show the work ethics of an individual and the traits are honor, work pride, trustworthiness but in this case he has proved that there is no such trait present in him so it constitute unethical behavior at workplace.
Answer:
D. The outlet substitution bias injects an upward bias into the CPI
Explanation:
