Hi. You have not shown the speech your question is referring to. But when searching for your question on the internet, I was able to find another question like yours that showed the speech "The Perils of Indifference." In that case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer:
His personal view increases his credibility as a primary source.
Explanation:
"The Perils of Indifference" begins with a third-person point of view, where Wiesel tells the story of a Jewish boy who was freed from a Nazi concentration camp by American troops. Wiesel then switches the point of view to the first-person point of view, where he reveals that the boy was him and starts talking about how he feels when he remembers the day he was released and what he went through as a prisoner in the camp concentration. The shift to the first-person point of view, gives credibility to Wiesel's speech, as it shows that his narrative is a primary source, that is, it is the report of someone who lived the moment he is presenting and is reporting that moment first hand, without adaptations and without the need for third parties.
Answer:
she <u>had </u><u>c</u><u>o</u><u>m</u><u>e </u> just from school when she <u>met.</u>
hope it helps :)
Answer:
The film adaptation of "The crucible" begins with the girls dancing in the woods. This is done with a double purpose:
<u>1. To set the atmosphere of the story.</u>
By starting with this scene (which in the orginal text takes place off stage) the viewer is placed on the theme of suspicious that is present all throughout the story, because we might believe that they are doing something off but we are not entirely certain about it. The theme of witchcraft is also established through this scene.
<u>2. To create a dramatic effect over the viewer. </u>
There is a clear impact on the viewer by starting the film with the girls dancing around, it makes the accusation that comes later much more real and it allows the viewer to place himself in the eyes of Parris, the one who sees the girls dancing.
What book I didn’t read that book
<span>1. Both authors use descriptive adjectives.
2. Both authors impart an ominous mood.
5. Both authors use a concerned tone.</span>