................
Step-by-step explanation:
it would at LEAST be like around 20-30 because a 0 can drop something FAST
Answer:
Recall that a relation is an <em>equivalence relation</em> if and only if is symmetric, reflexive and transitive. In order to simplify the notation we will use A↔B when A is in relation with B.
<em>Reflexive: </em>We need to prove that A↔A. Let us write J for the identity matrix and recall that J is invertible. Notice that
. Thus, A↔A.
<em>Symmetric</em>: We need to prove that A↔B implies B↔A. As A↔B there exists an invertible matrix P such that
. In this equality we can perform a right multiplication by
and obtain
. Then, in the obtained equality we perform a left multiplication by P and get
. If we write
and
we have
. Thus, B↔A.
<em>Transitive</em>: We need to prove that A↔B and B↔C implies A↔C. From the fact A↔B we have
and from B↔C we have
. Now, if we substitute the last equality into the first one we get
.
Recall that if P and Q are invertible, then QP is invertible and
. So, if we denote R=QP we obtained that
. Hence, A↔C.
Therefore, the relation is an <em>equivalence relation</em>.
7=2x + 15 2x= -8 x= -4
<span>8= 3x 8= 3x+0 3x +-8 3(-4) +-8 -12 - 8 </span>
<span>Final Answer -20</span>
I believe the answer your looking for is B.. good luck my friend!
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for this type of interest is
, where A is the total amount, P is the initial investment, x is the interest rate, n is the amount of times that the investment is compounded a year, and t is the amount of years. Plugging in the numbers given, you get:


Now, she invests this into a new account, and you can set up the following equation:

, or option A.
Hope this helps!