Answer:
This is not the case. Instead, use the equation M = 2/3log(S/S 0), where M is the amplitude of the first earthquake and S is the seismic moment. In this instance... 2/3log(S/S 0) = 3.3 log(S/S 0) = 3.3(2/3) log(S S 0) = 4.95 ten S = 10 = 4.95 = S/S 0 4.95*S 0*S 0*S 0*S 0* 610*104.95*S 0 = S 2/3log((610*104.95*S 0)/S 0) M M = 2/3log(60*104.95) M = 2/3log(60*104.95) M = 2/3log(60 5.156887 M = 5.156887 M = 5.156887 M = 5. As a result, the magnitude of the second quake is 5.156887.
Answer:
a) strong negative linear correlation.
b) Weak or no linear correlation.
c) strong positive linear correlation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient r measures the strength and direction (positive or negative) of two variables. The correlation coefficient r is always between -1 and 1. When the coefficient r is negative then the direction of the correlation is downhill (negative) and when it's positive then it's an uphill correlation (positive). Similarly, as the coefficient is closer to -1 or 1 the correlation is stronger, with zero being a non linear relationship.
Now back to the question:
a) Near -1: as we said before, this means an strong negative (-1) linear correlation.
b) Near 0: weak or no linear correlation (we cannot say if its positive or negative because we don't know it it's near zero from the right (positive numbers) or the left (negative numbers)
c) Near 1: strong positive (close to +1) linear correlation
Answer:
The answer is 4. He sold the console for slightly more than 150 dollars.
Step-by-step explanation:
× 150 is 162.5 dollars.
The answer is 4. He sold the console for slightly more than 150 dollars.
Answer:
63.4
Step-by-step explanation:
tan Ф,6/3=2
Ф=arctan=2
tan-1
63.4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation: b - 8