1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Norma-Jean [14]
3 years ago
9

Why have so few banking executives, or any white-collar criminals, been held criminally liable for actions that cost more and ha

ve more victims than street crime?
Social Studies
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]3 years ago
5 0

<u>Answer:</u>

A very few banking executives or white-collar criminals have been held criminally liable for their actions because such criminals often possess the power to influence the decisions of the courts and at times also use their power to destroy the evidence that would work against them.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • Though the crimes committed by white collar criminals are way too serious than the crimes committed by common people, the white-collar criminals manage to escape the clutches of the laws by putting to use the best of their resources to try to influence the judges and other systems involved.
  • These criminals have contacts with the people in power, which helps them negotiate with such people and find ways to get the accusations against them cleared.
You might be interested in
In 2008 the number of new cases of HIV infection in Africa slowly declined, though the total number of people living with HIV an
kati45 [8]

the answer is D. Access to prevention and treatment became more available.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did the notion of unalienable rights, listed in the Declaration of Independence, come from?
lapo4ka [179]
B, John Locke came up with the idea of the Declaration of Independence
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the British turn the war in their favor? by allowing the colonists to control the war effort by ending alliances with Am
Zielflug [23.3K]
The correct answer is "by sending more British forces into the battle".

The French and Indian War started in 1754 and finished with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war gave Great Britain colossal regional picks up in North America, however arguments about resulting wilderness strategy and paying the war's costs prompted pioneer discontent, and eventually to the American Revolution.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Russian colonizers keep the indigenous people of Alaska enslaved?
Alex777 [14]

Answer:

The Russians did establish hospitals at Sitka, Kodiak, Unalaska, and Atka between 1817 and 1821. These offered free treatment to the Natives. The Russians also vaccinated some Natives against smallpox. ... The Aleuts and Alutiiq Eskimos were the most affected by the Russians' presence in Alaska

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the boxes in the table to compare and contrast Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge's policies and
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

Harding - raised tariffs.

Coolidge - frugal policies.

Both - pro-business agenda, reduced world wide armament.

Explanation:

Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were the 29th and 30th Presidents of the United States. Both of their terms were during 1920's.

While their policies differentiated in some aspects, in other they were quite similar. For example, they were both republicans, who had a pro-business agenda.

But, living in the aftermath of <em>World War I</em>, Harding's main political goal was to protect american industries and agriculture to secure postwar recovery and avoid recession. Main strategy for this was to impose and raise tariffs. Coolidge continued with this policies (with keeping the tariffs high, but not raising them anymore), trying to protect american manufacturing against foreign competition. Harding's tariffs were at the record high by that time.

Also, they were both aiming to reduce world wide armament to prevent another disaster like the WWI. While Harding urged for lower defence costs during his campaign, this was not a major issue for him. He enacted an international agreement for reducing naval fleets of major powers at that time - USA, UK and Japan. On the other side, Calvin Coolidge's primary foreign policy initiative was the <em>Kellog-Briand Pact</em> of 1928, with the goal of renuncing war, as an instrument of national policy. Even though this Pact was never fully achieved, he managed to cut spending for the military, which leads us to his broader policies of cutting military spendings.

As oposed to Harding who was a protectionist, Calvin Coolidge believed in the minimal involvement of the state in order to produce government surplus, which is why he is known by his frugal policies.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How is acid rain, air pollution, and nuclear disaster all similar?
    13·1 answer
  • What were the Nuremberg laws?
    11·2 answers
  • The Sons of Liberty: a. enjoyed support from New York craftsmen and laborers. b. opposed any violent response to the Stamp Act.
    10·1 answer
  • After World War II, which two superpowers engaged in the Cold War?
    15·2 answers
  • When making decisions about career, one should take into consideration
    13·1 answer
  • An increase in Mexico’s demand for United States goods would cause the value of the dollar to
    5·1 answer
  • What is the correct meaning of the word method?
    11·1 answer
  • We are dead if we voted for either trump or biden (us) for LQTBQ+ community
    8·1 answer
  • The notion that workers tend to show an increase in
    9·2 answers
  • When force is 20 N, mass is 5 kg, what is acceleration?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!