Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Answer:
Accounts receivable $361,000 debit
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $560 debit
Net Sales $806,000 credit
0.4% of credit sales are uncollectible = 0.4% x $806,000 = $3,224
adjusting entry:
December 31, 202x
Dr Bad debt expense 3,224
Cr Allowance for doubtful accounts 3,224
Allowance for doubtful accounts is a contra asset account that reduces accounts receivable.
the answer to this is true
Answer:
E. Thompson memo
Explanation:
The name 'Thompson Memo' was used to honor the Deputy attorney General that first issued the memo in 2003. His name is Larry Thompson.
The memo was created to distinguished the line between the 'honest mistake' that the company might do and an actual wrongdoings that must be punished by law.
The memo consist of several criteria that future prosecutors can use to determine whether a company should be punished or not. Those criterias are:
- The nature/seriousness of the offense
- Whether they did a similar 'mistake in the past
- Whether the company admit the mistake by their own or whether it's exposed by other people
- Whether the company proposed a remedial action.
