Answer:
$65
Explanation:
The calculation of the break even price for this position is given elow:
Break even price is
= Strike price - premium
= $70 - $5
= $65
The stock goes increase i.e. upwards to $65 so the amount that lose is only $5 but it declines than the stock would be $0
Therefore, the break even price of this position is $65
So, by using the above formula we can get the break even price and the same is to be considered
<u>Answer:</u> Option C World event
<u>Explanation:</u>
The labor market which is affected by a man made event that is the world event is known as war. Here in the above case the labor market demand increases when there is war situation between two countries. As the demand for uniforms and weapons increases. This is because the countries require additional resources to prove their strength.
Excess demand for labor exist when there is war. This changes the unemployment situation and any labor with or without skills are hired to meet the demand in the labor market.
Tyro has the right to drive across ula's land, which is next to tyro's property, to reach an access road. tyro's right is:____.
Easement Appurtenant
What is easement appurtenant ?
A permanent easement that is attached to the land and benefits the owner. A covenant that follows the land is known as an easement appurtenant. The easement annex is transferred together with the title to the actual estate whenever a new owner takes ownership.
To get to an access road, Tyro has the right to drive across Ula's property, which is near to Tyro's property. tyro's right is Easement Appurtenant.
Learn more about Easement appurtenant here:
brainly.com/question/14368215
#SPJ4
Answer: ethical dilemma
Explanation: In simple words, ethical dilemma refers to a condition in which an individual in authority have to make a choice of accepting one alternative over other in which none of the alternative is fully acceptable from the point of ethics.
In other words, it can be defined as a situation in which two principles of ethical psychology conflicts with each other. In these conditions, authority making the decision can never be fully ethical and have to give priority to one of the principles involved.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case depicts ethical dilemma.
Answer:
PART A:
For preparing the predistribution plan we first caluclate the order of partnership elimination based on their capital accounts and the profit sharing ratio.
The lowest capital contributor is eliminated first and so on. Which is attached in figure 1
Then we prepared the predistribution plan which is attached in figure 2
PART B
The statement is attached in figure 3
