1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denis-greek [22]
2 years ago
13

What domestic issues did England and France have?

History
1 answer:
Setler [38]2 years ago
5 0

Mostly wars.

They always fought each other since 1193-1199.

You might be interested in
In which state would a pro-immigration message most likely have worked more effectively in 2010 than in 1970?
Serga [27]

Answer:The year 1965 is often cited as a turning point in the history of US immigration, but what happened in the ensuing years is not well understood. Amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act passed in that year repealed the national origins quotas, which had been enacted during the 1920s in a deliberate attempt to limit the entry of Southern and Eastern European immigrants—or more specifically Jews from the Russian Pale and Catholics from Poland and Italy, groups at the time deemed “unassimilable.” The quotas supplemented prohibitions already in place that effectively banned the entry of Asians and Africans. The 1965 amendments were intended to purge immigration law of its racist legacy by replacing the old quotas with a new system that allocated residence visas according to a neutral preference system based on family reunification and labor force needs. The new system is widely credited with having sparked a shift in the composition of immigration away from Europe toward Asia and Latin America, along with a substantial increase in the number of immigrants.

Indeed, after 1965 the number of immigrants entering the country did increase, and the flows did come to be dominated by Asians and Latin Americans. Although the amendments may have opened the door to greater immigration from Asia, however, the surge in immigration from Latin America occurred in spite of rather than because of the new system. Countries in the Western Hemisphere had never been included in the national origins quotas, nor was the entry of their residents prohibited as that of Africans and Asians had been. Indeed, before 1965 there were no numerical limits at all on immigration from Latin America or the Caribbean, only qualitative restrictions. The 1965 amendments changed all that, imposing an annual cap of 120,000 on entries from the Western Hemisphere. Subsequent amendments further limited immigration from the region by limiting the number of residence visas for any single country to just 20,000 per year (in 1976), folding the separate hemispheric caps into a worldwide ceiling of 290,000 visas (in 1978), and then reducing the ceiling to 270,000 visas (in 1980). These restrictions did not apply to spouses, parents, and children of US citizens, however.

Thus the 1965 legislation in no way can be invoked to account for the rise in immigration from Latin America. Nonetheless, Latin American migration did grow. Legal immigration from the region grew from a total of around 459,000 during the decade of the 1950s to peak at 4.2 million during the 1990s, by which time it made up 44 percent of the entire flow, compared with 29 percent for Asia, 14 percent for Europe, 6 percent for Africa, and 7 percent for the rest of the world (US Department of Homeland Security 2012). The population of unauthorized immigrants from Latin America also rose from near zero in 1965 to peak at around 9.6 million in 2008, accounting for around 80 percent of the total present without authorization (Hoefer, Rytina, and Baker 2011; Wasem 2011). How this happened is a complicated tale of unintended consequences, political opportunism, bureaucratic entrepreneurship, media guile, and most likely a healthy dose of racial and ethnic prejudice. In this article, we lay out the sequence of events that culminated in record levels of immigration from Latin America during the 1990s. We focus particularly on the case of Mexico, which accounted for two-thirds of legal immigration during the decade and for three-quarters of all illegal migration from the region.

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!3. Read the quote below, and then answer the question that follows.
malfutka [58]
<span>C. Hitler was opposed to the Treaty of Versailles</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the idea of Christendom instrumental in improving Charlemagne's reign?
love history [14]
I think so it is <span>A.)Christendom established self-sustaining monasteries during the reign of Charlemagne, which reduced the need for direct rule.
use process of elimination it helps.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What was the main goal of the Confederate Army in Texas?
Allushta [10]
The main goal was to keep the slaves from joining so B is the answer
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Michalangelos prefferee art form was​
stepan [7]

Answer:

Michelangelo's preferred art form was Sculpting.

Explanation:

Michelangelo restored and enhanced the design of Bramante, while he was the chief architect of St. Peter's Basilica. The original wooden design of St. Peters Basilica (created by Michelangelo) can be found in The Vatican for those of you looking for that answer too.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In Meiji Japan, who was subject to military service
    7·1 answer
  • Objective historians behave in all of the following ways except
    13·1 answer
  • To keep freed black people from voting, southern state legislatures: a. Gave black people phony ballots. B. Reinstated slavery.
    10·2 answers
  • What is the most important fundamental principles of our government?
    15·1 answer
  • What czar turned Russia into a police state?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the main geographical features of the Arctic Cultural Region
    12·1 answer
  • Why did Pope Gregory VII and Henry IV come into conflict?
    10·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    12·2 answers
  • Which has been a part of the growth of the EU since 2004? North African nations have joined. Eastern European nations have joine
    14·1 answer
  • The mayflower compact was our first form of ____ ______
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!