Explanation:
To find the probability that the sample which fails to meet the required weight or the standard weight of the marshmallows having banana flavor if the process of production is working, such that probability for the weekly sample leads to shutdown of the production if the process of the production is running properly of 1 % of the probability that at least five boxes out of the twenty five sample fails to meet the standard weight which is less than one percent that is ![$p(x \geq 5) \leq 0.01$](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%24p%28x%20%5Cgeq%205%29%20%5Cleq%200.01%24)
We know that for p = 0.8, ![$p(x \geq 5) = 0.0452$](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%24p%28x%20%5Cgeq%205%29%20%3D%200.0452%24)
Now using binomial simulation, we can determine that
for p = 0.0452
So the production process is to be redesigned for reducing the percentage of boxes of the Go Bananas of 16 ounces which failed to meet the required weight of the marshmallows having banana flavor if the production process is working properly to 5.42 percent.
Answer:
Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project?
Marston C Company should reject the project because its expected return is lower than Division H's cost of capital.
Since the divisions' risk is so different, and probably their projects are also very different, the company should use different costs of capital to accept of reject the projects based on each division's cost of capital.
Imagine another situation where Division L is evaluating a project that yields 10%. If they used the company's WACC, then they should reject the project, but if they used the division's cost of capital, then they should accept the project (in this case I would recommend accepting it).
Explanation:
Division H's risk = 14%
Division L's risk = 8%
WACC = 11%
Answer:
As a part of CSR initiatives (or purely governmental), nurturing environmental beneficial factors is always a plus for the whole economy.
Decreasing pollution can further improve the tourism sector, and change property values by encouraging real estate in "green areas". Clean energy initiatives (wind and solar energy) have the ability to transform the whole energy industry, which is the input for most economy processes and businesses.
Answer:
$9,240 loss recognized
$43,000 basis
Explanation:
Tax basis of share purchase is the cost of share together with any tax related to this purchase.
Mr. Slake's loss recognized on the February 13 sale is $9,240 = total cost of 1,580 share purchased in the past - total amount collected from sales of these share = $49,240 - $40,000 = $9,240
His tax basis in purchase of 1,600 shares on Mar 2 is $43,000, the total cost he paid to acquire 1,600 shares
The correct answer is D. I saw other people put this so sorry I don’t really know why I’m sorry