Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
$3,100
Explanation:
Step 1: Draw up the Accounts Receivable Account
Opening Balance $600 Allowance for Doubtful debt $200
Sales $3,200 Cash Collected $3,100
Closing Balance <u>$500</u>
<u>$3,800</u> <u>$3,800 </u>
To calculate the cash collected from customers
first, add the debit side of the accounts receivable which is a sum of the opening balance and sales= 3,800
Secondly, add the figures in the credit side including allowance for doubtful debt and closing balance= $700
Thirdly, Subtract the lesser side from the greater, $3,800 - $700 = $3,100
$3,100 was cash collected from the customers in 2016
Answer:internet businesses are often called Ecommerce businesses
Explanation:
What ???????????? I’m confused
Answer:
i) Z = 20( 80 ) + 50(20 ) = $2600
ii) $3000
Explanation:
representing products A and B as x₁ and x₂
using the given data
Max ( z ) = 20x₁ + 50x₂ ( optimal product mix for optimal profit ) ---- ( 1 )
0.8 ( x₁ + x₂ ) ≥ 0
0.8x₁ + 0.8x₂ ≥ 0 ------------ ( 2 )
also x₁ ≤ 100 --- ( 3 ) considering the amount to be sold ( sales volume )
based on the availability of raw material
2x₁ + 4x₂ ≤ 240 ----- ( 4 )
resolve equations 2, 3, and 4 graphically
x₁ = 80 units , x₂ = 20 units
back to equation 1
Z = 20( 80 ) + 50(20 )
= 1600 + 1000 = $2600
ii) To increase the number of units of A produced
given that x₁ ≤ 100 and the actual optimal units produced = 80 units
2600 + 20(100-80)
= 2600 + 20(20) = 2600 + 400 = $3000
