Answer:
E) $2.31
Explanation:
Shares offered to Firm B = Shares outstanding * 0.5
= 220 * 0.5
= 110 shares
Total shares of firm A after merger = Shares outstanding before merger + Shares offered to Firm B
= 750 + 110
= 860 shares
Total earnings of firm A after merger = $1,250 + 740
Total earnings of firm A after merger = $1,990
Earnings per share of firm A after merger = Total earnings of firm A after merger / Total shares of firm A after merger
Earnings per share of firm A after merger = $1,990 / 860
Earnings per share of firm A after merger = $2.31 per share
In this example, Kiwanuka is suing for intentional infliction of emotional distress. This can be defined as extreme and outrageous conduct which results in severe emotional distress to another person. This act must be severely extreme, to an extent that is not normally tolerated by society. In such cases, threatening conduct coupled with repeated annoyances can be enough to offer support to a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
If I were the judge, I would rule in favor of Kiwanuka, as I the fact that Bakilana held Kiwanuka in isolation and confiscated her passport is evidence of extreme emotional distress.
The correct answer is not among all the choices. The answer is "common response." This<span> is an example of an association likely caused by common response. </span>Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
Option (b) for a response. In order to keep the expenditure multiplier from exceeding 1, output must increase while consumption must decrease.
<h3>Spending multiplier: What does it tell you?</h3>
An economic indicator of the impact that changes in government spending and investment have on a nation's Gross Domestic Product is the expenditure multiplier, often known as the fiscal multiplier.
<h3>When the multiplier is negative, what does that mean?</h3>
The negative multiplier effect happens when a spending leak or initial withdrawal from the circular flow has further impacts and a larger final decline in real GDP.
<h3>Why does multiplier exceed 1?</h3>
The rise in the national product indicates a rise in national income. Consumption demand rises as a result, and businesses produce to satisfy it. As a result, the increase in investment is greater than the increase in national income and product. There is a multiplier effect that exceeds one.
Learn more about expenditure multiplier: brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
