1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
3 years ago
9

Since risk cannot be reduced to zero, the as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) concept is often applied. How can this concep

t be used to determine acceptable levels of risk? What might be some pitfalls to applying this concept?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mumz [18]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: This concept can be used to determine the acceptable level of risk, by placing the amount of risk in a given situation to balance against time, trouble, cost, and physical difficulty of taking precautions to avoid risk. If a balance is seen with risk against this variables, then the risk is acceptable.

The pitfall to applying this concept are as follows;

• it doesn't guarantee safety.

• it is always expensive, if we want to apply this principle to it best.

• it doesn't have a standard order for all kinds of risk. The application varies from risk to risk, also depending on locations of the risk.

Explanation: The ALARP principle is that risk shall be reduced as far as reasonably practicable. This means that zero risk can not be achieved. But we can achieve zero accident, using the ALARP principle.

Before we can boast for achieving ALARP, we must check if the risk is equal or less than time spent,cost, the trouble or challenge, and the physical difficulty of taking a good measure to avoid the risk. If the risk is equal or less than this variables, that means that the risk has been reduced as far as reasonably practicable.

You might be interested in
When a psychologist compares the symptoms an individual is experiencing to the symptoms of various disorders to determine the sp
Serga [27]
It seems that you have missed the given options for this question, but anyway, here is the answer. <span>When a psychologist compares the symptoms an individual is experiencing to the symptoms of various disorders to determine the specific disorder the individual has, the psychologist is concerned with the DIAGNOSIS. Other options include treatment, prognosis and etiology. Hope this answer helps. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Despite the fact that school-based psychological counseling is available to all students, thomas et al., report that ethnic disp
muminat
Support them without the use of money or with comfort
4 0
3 years ago
Many of us use heuristics each day in completing ordinary activities—such as planning our meals, executing our workout routine,
aliina [53]

Answer:

You could include Herbert's Simon's satisficing and Amos Tversky's elimination-by-aspect heuristic rules.  

From Satisficing strategy, you must decide which are your goals, what do you want to achieve through social invitations.

By doing this, you are setting an aspiration level. Then, you choose the alternative that satisfies your aspiration.

On the other hand, you can use elimination-by-aspects heuristic strategy to reduce the number of alternatives that do not meet the aspiration level.

7 0
3 years ago
Japan’s location is considered a resource. How does the location MOST benefit the country?
Stells [14]
Its the location allows japan to easily export their manufactured goods hope it help sorry if it doesn't.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the United States and Canada enter into a trade deal that allows Canada to trade oil to the U.S. and the U.S. to trade auto p
sashaice [31]

Based on comparative advantage and the situation described above, <u>the country that would benefit is Canada, while the country would be at a disadvantage in the United States.</u>

<h3>What is Comparative Advantage?</h3>

Comparative Advantage is the economic term used to describe the economy's ability of a company or country to manufacture a specific commodity or service at a cheaper opportunity cost than its trading partners.

Therefore, currently, Canada is known to have many industries in the oil, such as petroleum and natural gas. Therefore, Canada can quickly produce and trade oil at cheaper production costs with the United States.

However, United States' top industry does not include auto part production; therefore, to trade auto parts with Canada would be expensive to the United States.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Canada would benefit, while the United States would be at a disadvantage.

Learn more about Comparative Advantage here: brainly.com/question/7045530

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the 13th, 14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, 26th amendments impact minority participation in the political process?
    5·1 answer
  • Is it apparent that the hammurabi code is clearly the product of a civilization, rather than some other kind of early society? D
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the correct answer?
    14·1 answer
  • According to marx, human history shows that struggle develops between the thesis and its antithesis, leading to a synthesis. mar
    11·1 answer
  • . Harrison et al. are conducting a study assessing the ability of depressed versus non-depressed participants to remember negati
    13·1 answer
  • Why does artie call his father a murderer? is he justified? who else has he called a murderer, and why?
    11·1 answer
  • Explaining What factors contributed to the rise of nationalism in the 1810s?
    13·1 answer
  • Emma is a video-game programmer. She writes the code for a game in which players are awarded five points every time they complet
    12·1 answer
  • 3(f+2)+9=13+f+4f find f
    5·1 answer
  • What most likely describes how Abe was feeling during this time when he had so much work to do?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!