Answer:
This statement is True. Opposing views on the right to privacy played a major role the Supreme Courts decision to legalize abortion.
Explanation:
Roe v. Wade (1973) is a Supreme Court case ruling that transformed American attitudes towards privacy. The debate about abortion rights that is represented in this case brought the idea of our American right to privacy into the mainstream. The ruling was passed with a margin of 7-2 and was largely based on the process clause contained in the Fourteenth Amendment: “…nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” It was thus that the Supreme Court ruled that criminalizing abortion violated a woman’s constitutional right to privacy.
<span>This would be a violation of the 6th Amendment. Every defendant is permitted to have counsel who will represent him in a court of law, and this counsel is allowed to help the defendant prepare his case and those who will testify on his behalf.</span>
Answer:
Because Joe may be meeting with individuals who are not existing clients and may be Florida residents, he must be registered in the state of Florida as an IAR.
Explanation:
In the case shown in the above question, the IAR presents itself as a temporary installation, which is used only for quick meetings with customers, while the terms of contracts and arrangements are being discussed. However, as we can see in the text above, there is a place where businesses are managed in that state. For this reason, the IAR must be registered anyway.
It is important to note that KAPCO is officially an AI that has federal coverage, so a registration notice should be evaluated.
