Answer:
A) the poor and indebted citizens of England
Explanation:
- The Revolution happened in second half of 18th Century, so it is impossible to be addressed to those who lost property then.
- King of England would never address the slaves.
- So, it has to be C or D. It is D, because he is addressing the poor people who need to maintain their families.
Answer:
The answer is B, delta. I took the quiz:)
Explanation:
Explanation:
2 accoplishments were:
1) A more efficient means to transport goods- The cost to ship goods from New York to the modern day midwest drastically decreased thanks to the development of the Erie Canal.
2) Growth of cities in New York and the Midwest- The Erie Canal connected the eastern and western portions of New York, allowing for cities to prosper throughout the state. This included cities like Rochester and Syracuse. Along with this, the Erie Canal also allowed for easy access to the Midwest since it connected to the Great Lakes. This allowed for cities like Cleveland to develop into an important trading hub.
Nebraska
After Taylor died and was succeeded by Fillmore, Douglas took the lead in passing Clay's compromise through Congress as five separate bills . Under the compromise texas surrended it claims to present New Mexico and other state in return for federal assumption of Texas's public debt. California was admitted as a free state while the remaining portions of the Mexican cession were organized into new Mexico territory and Utah territory under the concept of popular Sovereignty,the people of each territory would decide whether or not slavery would be permitted. the compromise also include more stringent fugutive slave law and banned the slave trades in Washington, D.C. the issue of slavery in the territo
ries would be re-open by the Kansas- Nebraska Act, but many historians argue that the compromise of 1850 played a major role in postponing the American Civil War
Answer:
Option A: Analogical reasoning is an approach to understanding past patterns.
Explanation:
When a person applies analogical reasoning they compare something in their current environment with past phenomena to help understand what is transpiring. Organizations use earlier cases to try to understand how their actions might affect the future. While analogies can be useful, the past does not repeat in the future in any simple way. You have to be able to discern what is important in the pattern and how it can be applied forward to inform on present actions. When applying analogical reasoning there needs to be careful attention to the similarities and differences between the phenomena or cases being contrasted and compared.
