I don't know if that is factor-able. It looks like you could just subtract and get 64t. which would lead to the answer being zero since you divide by zero when isolating the variable t.
Answer:
a = 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
(4(x+1) + 20 )/(x+1) = 16
4x + 4 + 20 = 16x + 16
12x = 8
x = 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
fg(x) =
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fcec/2fcec7989de1da3d9fb3d33c67438e1ce202235c" alt="{(x - 4)}^{2} + 3(x - 4)"
=
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25350/253502a37ab71447bc7a2cce932b6cd023ef457e" alt="{x}^{2} + 16 - 8x + 3x - 12"
=
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0ed6/f0ed69602bda8032c0f8dc999678033f8b6b6f5f" alt="{x}^{2} - 5x + 4"
Ouuuuuuuuuu I want a cookie
Answer:
Is x = 4 a solution to the equation 6 = x + 2? YES
Is x = 4 a solution to the inequality 2x ≥ 9? NO
Step-by-step explanation:
Is x = 4 a solution to the equation 6 = x + 2? YES
we cans solve the equation 6=x+2 by clearing for x:
6 = x + 2
we move the +2 on the right as a -2 to the left:
6 - 2 = x
4 = x
this way we find that indeed x = 4 is a solution to 6 = x + 2.
Is x = 4 a solution to the inequality 2x ≥ 9? NO
Let's solve the inequality by clearing for x:
2x ≥ 9
we move the 2 that is multiplying on the left to divide on the right side:
x ≥ 9/2
x ≥ 4.5 ⇒ <u>x must be greater than or equal to 4.5</u>
thus, <u>4 is not a solution to the inequality</u> because 4 is less than 4.5