The conflict in the United States then was that Congress do not have the power to tax and they do not also have the power to monitor foreign and interstate commerce, etc.
<h3>What was this issue about?</h3>
The Articles of Confederation was said to have made a kind of loose confederation where there was a sovereign states and then a kind of weak central government.
Conclusively, Here, almost all power were said to be with the state governments. and thus issue were said to arise as Congress do not have the power to tax and they do not also have the power to monitor foreign and interstate commerce, etc.
Learn more about conflict from
brainly.com/question/24769299
#SPJ1
Answer:
the purpose of a will is so you can give you recent belongings and money to you family and friends.
Explanation:
I think that it was completely childish. i mean don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious, but trump really really annoyed me. neither of them could get a proper answer out and it annoyed the hell out of me. the fact that trump didn’t denounce white supremacy just didn’t sit right with me
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"
I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.
For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.
Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
I believe there was one, which was a legislative branch. There were state run governments. But the states ultimately had more power than the federal government.
