All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
One reason it was good that went to war with Britain is that their might be a few differences if we wouldn't have
As a result, for the most part, the English colonies in the North America were business ventures. They provided an outlet fir England’s surplus population and (in some cases) more religious freedom than England did, but their primary putpose was to make money for their sponsors.
Answer:
Most of the Slaves travelled to the Americas.
Explanation:
Most of the Slaves travelled to the Americas because Europeans wanted to profit off sugar cane that they had in the Brazil area and the Carribean.
